The Tamil National People’s Front (TNPF) has questioned Sri Lanka’s motives for its recent proscription of Tamil diaspora organisations and individuals based on information which the government claims to have procured from LTTE officials five years ago.

Speaking at a press conference on Monday, President, Mr Gajendrakumar Ponnambalam stated that the TNPF condemned the extensive ban and believed that there was no evidence or justification to support it.

Explaining what the TNPF believed to be the main motives for the ban, Mr Ponnambalam said:

“After a resolution critical of Sri Lanka was passed in Geneva, the government now needs to save face in the south. This ban is the government’s way of protecting its Sinhala nationalist credentials.”

“Since the Rajapaksa government rests on the laurels of having defeated the LTTE, it needs to reiterate this to its voter base, to counter the increasing humiliation Sri Lanka has faced internationally.”

Tamil Nadu’s fishing community expressed relief at India’s loss to Sri Lanka in the ICC T20 cricket world cup final, as a previous win was followed by attacks at sea believed to revenge by Sri Lankan navy personal, the Times of India reports.

The National Freedom Front (NFF), a partner of President Mahinda Rajapaksa's ruling coalition, warned the Sri Lankan government against being caught in an ‘international trap’ set by ‘enemy forces’ in the guise of an international investigation into wartime atrocities, reported ColomboPage.

A spokesman for the NFF, Mohammad Muzammil, told reporters that India’s motives in abstaining on the UN resolution against Sri Lanka were doubtful. He accused India of secretly backing an international investigation, and claimed Delhi was instrumental in getting two previous resolutions on Sri Lanka through the UN Human Rights Council.

The Sri Lankan government's proscription last week of 15 Tamil diaspora organisations and over 400 individuals was a brazen attempt to instil fear into the Tamil people. Over and beyond those specifically named or officially affiliated to the organisations, given the organisations' mass membership, the proscription criminalises a quarter of the Eelam Tamil population, and all Tamils living on the island who engage with them. It is the mass banning of Tamil civil society. Sri Lanka's broad definition of 'terrorism', including those demanding Tamil political rights and those that criticise human rights abuses by the state, effectively encompasses any threat to Sinhala Buddhist hegemony. Any remaining faint hopes of reconciliation, are made even more unlikely. Ultimately and entirely in keeping with the Sri Lankan state's overarching and long-standing project of consolidating its hegemony, the proscription - ironically only made significant by virtue of the nation's very inextricable connectedness - is an attempt to dismantle the Tamil nation and thereby seek to extinguish the nation's political aspirations.

The Sri Lankan government may take legal action against people testifying before any UN implemented commission, reports Ceylon Today.

Minister of Mass Media Keheliya Rambukwella said:

Sri Lanka will not cooperate with the United Nations’ inquiry into wartime mass atrocities, Foreign Minister GL Peiris said Monday, in comments reported by Reuters and AP.

"Where the government is required to do anything to support the investigation or to participate in it, the government will not do that," he said.

"They [UN] will have to tell us what they want to do. But the clear policy decision had been taken that we do not associate ourself with the inquiry and we do not submit to the jurisdiction of the investigating committee," he said.

"Nobody can come here without the cooperation of the Sri Lankan government," he added.

The government had not accepted the UN investigations due to concerns over its legality, fairness, and some conflict of interest issues, he said.

Sri Lanka’s government has taken “a policy decision” to “reject outright” the international probe into the island’s wartime mass atrocities authorised by the UN Human Rights Council in a resolution passed on March 27, the Sunday Times reports.

The paper also quoted sources at the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR), which the HRC resolution mandated to conduct the probe, as saying the international investigative mechanism would be in place within three to four weeks.

At a meeting of party leaders last Sunday, three days after the UN vote, the ruling coalition made “a policy decision that the government would in no way allow an OHCHR international investigation in Sri Lanka under any circumstances,” the paper said.

"We have already spoken to the South African High Commissioner about this. I myself have personally spoken to him before Geneva on this, that we need normalcy."