British parliament decided against potential military intervention in Syria following a 7 hour debate, today.
Debating the Prime Minister’s amendment, that called for a further discussion over military intervention once the United Nations confirmed their findings in Syria, the House of Commons outlined its unwillingness to support any British military intervention. The government amendment was defeated by 285 votes to 272.
Despite expressing discontent over the result, David Cameron pledged not to go against the will of the House of Commons, stating,
“ I strongly believe in the need for a tough response to the use of chemical weapons. But I also believe in respecting the will of the House of Commons. It is clear to me that the British Parliament, reflecting the views of the British people, does not want to see British military action. I get that and the Government will act accordingly.”
In light of Britain’s stance, the United States indicated that it would go ahead with military intervention without the support of Britain.
The United States National Security Council spokeswoman, said,
“President Barack Obama’s decision making will be funded by what is in the best interests of the United States. He believes that there are core interests at stake for the United States and that countries who violate international norms regarding chemical weapons need to be held accountable.”